1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
2 for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
3
4 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
5 __________
6
7 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
8 AND INTERFERENCES
9 __________
10
11 Ex parte CAROLYN RAMSEY CATAN
12 __________
13
14 Appeal 2007-0820
15 Application 09/734,808
16 Technology Center 1700
17 __________
18
19 Decided: July 3, 2007
20 __________
21
22 Before MICHAEL R. FLEMING, Chief Administrative Patent Judge,
22 HUBERT C. LORIN, ALLEN R. MacDONALD, LINDA E. HORNER, and
23
23 ANTON W. FETTING, Administrative Patent Judges.
24
25
26 PER CURIAM
27
28
29 DECISION ON APPEAL
30
31
32 STATEMENT OF THE CASE
33
34 The appeal is from a decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 5-11
35 and 13-161. 35 U.S.C. § 134 (2002). We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.
36 § 6(b) (2002).
1 Claims 1-4, 12, and 17 have been canceled.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013