Ex Parte Stavely et al - Page 1

                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                    
                          for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                           

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                              
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                     Ex parte DONALD J. STAVELY,                                               
                               MARK J. BIANCHI, DAVID K. CAMPBELL,                                             
                             AMY E. BATTLES, and HEATHER NOEL BEAN                                             
                                              Appeal 2007-0831                                                 
                                           Application 10/417,656                                              
                                          Technology Center 2600                                               
                                           Decided: May 30, 2007                                               

                Before KENNETH W. HAIRSTON, JOHN C. MARTIN,                                                    
                and LANCE LEONARD BARRY,  Administrative Patent Judges.                                        
                HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                         

                                          DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   
                                       STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                   
                      Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from a Final Rejection of                        
                claims 1 to 24.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.  6(b).                                  

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013