Appeal 2007-0831
Application 10/417,656
decline Appellants’ invitation to read limitations from the disclosure into the
claims.
CONCLUSION OF LAW
The obviousness of the claimed subject matter has been demonstrated
by the Examiner. The Examiner did not have to resort to impermissible
hindsight to demonstrate the prima facie obviousness of claims 1 to 24.
DECISION
The obviousness rejections of claims 1 to 24 are affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv).
AFFIRMED
KIS
HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ADMINISTRATION
P.O. BOX 272400
FORT COLLINS, CO 80527-2400
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Last modified: September 9, 2013