Appeal 2007-0845
Application 10/268,135
catheter having a guide wire ramp structure meeting the limitations in claims
11 and 20.
Thus, we affirm the anticipation rejection of claims 11 and 20 over
Jang. Because Appellants’ arguments regarding claim 12 are based on the
limitations of claim 11, claim 12 falls with claim 11.
SUMMARY
We affirm the Examiner’s rejection of claims 1-6, 8-12, and 20 under
35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Jang.
AFFIRMED
lbg
PATRICK J. FAY, ESQ.
FAY KAPLUN & MARCIN, LLP
SUITE 702
150 BROADWAY
NEW YORK NY 10038
11
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Last modified: September 9, 2013