The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte WALTER HOWARD,
GARY SMITH and
JULIE MORRIS
____________
Appeal 2007-0875
Application 10/774,692
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: March 28, 2007
____________
Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, THOMAS A. WALTZ, and JEFFREY T.
SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the Primary Examiner’s refusal to
allow claims 11-20, 22-29, and 31-33 as amended subsequent to the final
rejection (see the Amendment dated April 11, 2006, entered as per the
Advisory Action dated April 20, 2006). Claims 11-20, 22-29, and 31-33 are
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013