1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written 2 for publication in and is not binding precedent of the Board. 3 4 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE 5 ___________ 6 7 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS 8 AND INTERFERENCES 9 ___________ 10 11 Ex parte DAVID J. WILSON 12 ___________ 13 14 Appeal 2007-0896 15 Application 09/731,019 16 Technology Center 2100 17 ___________ 18 19 Decided: May 22, 2007 20 ___________ 21 22 Before HUBERT C. LORIN, STUART S. LEVY and ANTON W. FETTING, 23 Administrative Patent Judges. 24 FETTING, Administrative Patent Judge. 25 DECISION ON APPEAL 26 27 28 STATEMENT OF CASE 29 This appeal involves claims 1, 2, and 7-17, the only claims pending in this 30 application. We have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 31 134. 32 33 We AFFIRM.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013