Appeal 2007-0896
Application 09/731,019
1 Accordingly we sustain the Examiner's rejection of claims 1-2 and 7-17 under
2 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over Klingman.
3
4 DECISION
5 To summarize, our decision is as follows:
6 • The rejection of claims 1-2 and 7-17 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(a) as anticipated
7 by NOWTHIS is not sustained, but the rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
8 obvious over NOWTHIS is sustained.
9 • The rejection of claims 1-2 and 7-17 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious
10 over Epinions and Salas is sustained.
11 • The rejection of claims 1-2 and 7-17 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious
12 over Klingman is sustained.
13 No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal
14 may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).
15
16 AFFIRMED
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 vsh
11
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013