The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte MICHAEL D. GANDRUD, TORBEN FREDERIKSEN, and JEFF HERRIN ____________ Appeal 2007-0904 Application 11/025,331 Technology Center 2800 ____________ Decided: June 26, 2007 ____________ Before JAMES D. THOMAS, JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO, and JEAN R. HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judges. HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL STATEMENT OF THE CASE Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner’s Final Rejection of claims 1, 3 through 7, and 9 through 22. Claims 2 and 8 have been canceled. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b) to decide this appeal.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013