Ex Parte Yamada - Page 1



                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                         
                                   is not binding precedent of the Board.                                   

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                              ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                             
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                              ____________                                                  
                                        Ex parte FUJIO YAMADA                                               
                                              ____________                                                  
                                            Appeal 2007-0921                                                
                                          Application 10/793,878                                            
                                          Technology Center 1700                                            
                                              ____________                                                  
                                          Decided:  June 29, 2007                                           
                                              ____________                                                  

               Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, CHARLES F. WARREN, and                                             
               PETER F. KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                
               KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                          

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                      This is a decision on an appeal from the Examiner’s final rejection of                
               claims 1, 3-10, 59, and 64-67, the only claims that remain pending in this                   
               application.  We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134.                       








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013