The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte FUJIO YAMADA ____________ Appeal 2007-0921 Application 10/793,878 Technology Center 1700 ____________ Decided: June 29, 2007 ____________ Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, CHARLES F. WARREN, and PETER F. KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges. KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal from the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1, 3-10, 59, and 64-67, the only claims that remain pending in this application. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013