Ex Parte Yamada - Page 2

               Appeal 2007-0921                                                                             
               Application 10/793,878                                                                       

                      Appellants’ invention is directed to molten material supply apparatus                 
               wherein a heating structure is designed to be supplied with material in the                  
               form of rods.  Claim 1 is illustrative and reproduced below:                                 
                      1. A molten material supply unit comprising:                                          
                      a heating cylinder constructed and arranged for receiving a solid                     
               material rods, and comprising an inlet open to the atmosphere which                          
               receives the solid material rods and an outlet spaced from the inlet; and                    
                      a vacuum device communicating with the heating cylinder and                           
               constructed and arranged to generate a reduced pressure environment within                   
               the heating cylinder,                                                                        
                      wherein the solid material rods are heated and melted in the reduced                  
               pressure environment as the rods move from the inlet to the outlet.                          
                                                                                                           
                      The Examiner relies on the following prior art references as evidence                 
               in rejecting the appealed claims:                                                            
               Premkumar US 5,775,403 Jul. 7, 1998                                                          
               Cook  US 5,860,468 Jan. 19, 1999                                                             
               Carden US 6,098,700 Aug.  8, 2000                                                            
                      Claims 1, 3-8, 59, and 64-67 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)                  
               as being unpatentable over Carden in view of Premkumar and Cook.                             
               Claims 9 and 10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being                             
               unpatentable over Carden in view of Premkumar, Cook, and Hamashima.                          
                      Concerning the Examiner’s first stated rejection, all of the rejected                 
               claims require a heating cylinder constructed and arranged for receiving                     
               solid material rods, the cylinder having an inlet open to the atmosphere, a                  
               spaced outlet, and a vacuum device communicating with the heating cylinder                   
               to provide a reduced pressure environment therewithin.  The Examiner                         

                                                     2                                                      

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013