Ex Parte Wood et al - Page 1



                    The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not                      
                      written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                    

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                           
                                            ________________                                                
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                             
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                            ________________                                                
                        Ex parte ALAN G. WOOD, WARREN M. FARNWORTH,                                         
                                DAVID R. HEMBREE, SIDNEY B. RIGG,                                           
                                WILLIAM M. HIATT, PETER BENSON,                                             
                                KYLE K. KIRBY, and SALMAN AKRAM                                             
                                            ________________                                                
                                            Appeal 2007-0942                                                
                                          Application 10/666,742                                            
                                         Technology Center 2800                                             
                                            ________________                                                
                                         Decided:  March 5, 2007                                            
                                            ________________                                                

               Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, BRADLEY R. GARRIS, and                                              
               CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                             
               KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                         

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                      This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 17-21, 23-27, and                
               30-34.  The Examiner has withdrawn the rejection of claims 22, 28, and 29,                   
               which claims stand objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base                       
               claim.  Claim 17 is illustrative:                                                            
                                                                                                           



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013