Appeal 2007-0942
Application 10/666,742
argument upon objective evidence of nonobviousness, such as unexpected
results.
In conclusion, based on the foregoing and the reasons well stated by
the Examiner, the Examiner’s decision rejecting the appealed claims is
affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv) (2006).
AFFIRMED
clj
Trask Britt
P.O. Box 2550
Salt Lake City, UT 84110
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5
Last modified: September 9, 2013