Ex Parte Taniguchi et al - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                  
                         for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                          

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ____________                                                  
                     Ex parte MICHIAKI TANIGUCHI and TOSHIYA KITAGAWA                                        
                                               ____________                                                  
                                             Appeal 2007-0973                                                
                                          Application 10/254,835                                             
                                          Technology Center 2800                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                                          Decided: May 31, 2007                                              
                                               ____________                                                  

                Before KENNETH W. HAIRSTON, HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP, and                                       
                MAHSHID D. SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.                                             

                BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                    


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                      This appeal involves claims 1-28, the only claims pending in this                      
                application.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. §§ 6(b), 134(a).                          








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013