The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ROBERT WILMER RODENBECK, ROGER KEITH RUSSELL,
and MICHAEL LEE LONG
____________
Appeal 2007-0981
Application 10/803,434
Technology Center 2600
____________
Decided: July 18, 2007
____________
Before LEE E. BARRETT, JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO, and ALLEN R.
MACDONALD, Administrative Patent Judges.
RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Final Rejection of
claims 1-7, 10-16, and 18-29. As indicated at page 2 of the Examiner’s
Answer, claims 18-26 have been allowed. Accordingly, only the rejection of
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013