Appeal 2007-0990 Application 09/871,920 (b) processing the content item through a plurality of stages of a content management process, including updating the content management information stored in the content management record during each stage of the content management process, wherein the plurality of stages includes at least one review stage during which approval of the content item is obtained; and (c) promoting the content item as a result of the content management process such that the content item is user accessible from the content- controlled database, including updating the content management information stored in the content management record to indicate that the content item has been promoted. THE REFERENCES Ivanov US 5,706,452 Jan. 6, 1998 Klibaner US 2002/0161597 A1 Oct. 31, 2002 (filed Jun. 27, 2001) THE REJECTION 1. Claims 1-50 and 59 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over the teachings of Ivanov in view of Klibaner. Rather than repeat the arguments of Appellants or the Examiner, we make reference to the Briefs and the Answer for the respective details thereof. ANALYSIS At the outset, we find both Appellants and the Examiner have given incomplete consideration to the teaching value of Ivanov and Klibaner. We 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013