The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ROGER LAM, WAI MON MA,
VINCENT L. MONTALBANO, ARCH NUTTALL,
and NANDU N. RANADIVE
____________
Appeal 2007-0998
Application 10/708,066
Technology Center 2800
____________
Decided: June 11, 2007
____________
Before KENNETH W. HAIRSTON, JOSEPH L. DIXON, and JOHN A.
JEFFERY, Administrative Patent Judges.
JEFFERY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner’s
rejection of claims 1-20. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We
affirm.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013