Ex Parte Lam et al - Page 2

               Appeal 2007-0998                                                                       
               Application 10/708,066                                                                 
                                                                                                     
                                    STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                             
                    Appellants invented a structure for attaching a heat sink to a                    
               semiconductor chip or package via a thermal interface layer.  Specifically,            
               spacer members are adhered between the substrate and the heat sink.  By                
               adhesively bonding the spacer members to the structure, the thermal                    
               interface layer need not include adhesive.  As a result, the thermal interface         
               layer can comprise materials with higher thermal conductivity.  Moreover,              
               removing the heat sink with such a structure will not damage the chip or the           
               module.1  Claim 1 is illustrative:                                                     
                    l.  A heat sink attachment structure, comprising:                                 
                    an integrated circuit chip mounted on a substrate surface;                        
                    a thermal interface layer in contact with said integrated circuit chip;           
                    a heat sink in contact with said thermal interface layer; and                     
                    at least one spacer member in contact between said substrate surface              
               and said heat sink, wherein said at least one spacer member is provided with           
               an adhesive material on top and bottom surfaces thereof.                               
                    The Examiner relies on the following prior art references to show                 
               unpatentability:                                                                       
               Toy                     US 6,218,730 B1          Apr. 17, 2001                         
               Boyer                   US 6,730,993 B1          May 4, 2004                           
                                                                (filed Jul. 26, 2001)                 

                    The Examiner’s rejections are as follows:                                         
                 1. Claims 1, 4, 6, 8, 11, 14, 17, and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C.                

                                                                                                     
               1 See generally Specification ¶¶ 0020-21; 0026.                                        
                                                  2                                                   

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013