Ex Parte Pedigo - Page 3



                   The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not                 
                    written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                       
                                         ________________                                             
                           BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                         
                                      AND INTERFERENCES                                               
                                         ________________                                             
                                   Ex parte  JOHN A. PEDIGO JR.                                       
                                         ________________                                             
                                          Appeal 2007-1022                                            
                                       Application 10/778,414                                         
                                       Technology Center 1700                                         
                                         ________________                                             
                                      Decided:  March 23, 2007                                        
                                      Remailed: April 26, 2007                                        
                                         ________________                                             
               Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, CATHERINE Q. TIMM, and                                        
               LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                       
               KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                   

                DECISION ON APPEAL AND ORDER REMANDING TO EXAMINER                                    
                    This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-9.  Claims 10-12           
               have been withdrawn from consideration.  Claim 1 is illustrative:                      
                    1. A webbing having a safety indicator comprising:                                
                    synthetic yarns, formed of synthetic material having a known degree               
               of strength loss as a result of exposure to a known amount of ultraviolet              
               light, inter-engaged to form said webbing:                                             






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013