The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte BARBARA HORN, KEITH KIRBY, SAM HOLMES,
MEHRGAN KHAVARI, RIO RIVAS, GERALD G. TRUNK,
DEANNA J. BERGSTROM, and CHON PHAM
____________
Appeal 2007-1054
Application 10/640,067
Technology Center 2800
____________
Decided: July 31, 2007
____________
Before JAMES D. THOMAS, JOSEPH L. DIXON, and
JEAN R. HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judges.
HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner’s Final
Rejection of claims 28 through 35. Claims 1 through 27 have been canceled.
We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b) to decide this appeal.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013