Appeal 2007-1054
Application 10/640,067
CONCLUSION OF LAW
On the record before us, Appellants have not shown that the Examiner
has failed to establish that Baughman anticipates claims 28 through 32 and
35 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b). Additionally, Appellants have not shown that
the Examiner has failed to establish that the combination of Baughman with
Maggs or Eyler renders claims 33 and 34 unpatentable under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a).
DECISION
We have affirmed the Examiner’s decision rejecting claims 28 through
35.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv).
AFFIRMED
rwk
HEWLETT PACKARD COMPANY
P O BOX 272400, 3404 E. HARMONY ROAD
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ADMINISTRATION
FORT COLLINS CO 80527-2400
12
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Last modified: September 9, 2013