The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte TODD D. CREGER, JAVAD HOSSEINI, and JAGANATHAN SARANGAPANI ____________ Appeal 2007-1088 Application 10/006,959 Technology Center 2100 ____________ Decided: July 31, 2007 ____________ Before JAMES D. THOMAS, JOHN C. MARTIN, and JEAN R. HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judges. THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This appeal involves claims 1 through 12, constituting all claims pending in the application. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. §§ 6(b) and 134(a). As best representative of the disclosed and claimed invention, independent claim 7 is reproduced below:Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013