The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte STEVE GLENNER, CURTIS G. WONG, and
STEVEN M. DRUCKER
__________
Appeal 2007-1089
Application 10/348,277
Technology Center 2100
__________
Decided: June 28, 2007
__________
Before LEE E. BARRETT, MAHSHID D. SAADAT, and
ST. JOHN COURTENAY III, Administrative Patent Judges.
COURTENAY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner’s Final
Rejection of claims 1-5 and 7-40. We AFFIRM. In addition, we have sua
sponte set forth new grounds of rejection under 35 U.S.C. §101 for claims 1-
5, 7-18, 20-33, and 35 pursuant to our authority under 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013