Appeal 2007-1089
Application 10/348,277
Fielder US 6,226,608 B1 May 1, 2001
Morioka US 2001/0021015 A1 Sep. 13, 2001
McGrath US 2002/0122659 A1 Sep. 5, 2002
Anderson US 2002/0152476 A1 Oct. 17, 2002
Lehmann US 2002/0169782 A1 Nov. 14, 2002
Perks US 2003/0005169 A1 Jan. 2, 2003
Kesselman US 2003/0233366 A1 Dec. 18, 2003
Abe US 6,714,216 B2 Mar. 30, 2004
Reshef US 2005/0114705 A1 May 26, 2005
THE REJECTIONS
A. Claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 7-9, 15, 16, 20, 23-27, 29, 30, 33-40 stand
rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over
Yao in view of Fielder.
B. Claim 3 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Yao in view of Fielder, and further in view of
Reshef.
C. Claims 10 and 11 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Yao in view of Fielder, and further in
view of Abe.
D. Claims 12 and 13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Yao in view of Fielder, and further in
view of Lehmann.
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013