Ex Parte Poppenga et al - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                  
                         for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                          

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ____________                                                  
                         Ex parte BURTON H. POPPENGA, JAMES S. BOYCE,                                        
                                             and JON BAKER                                                   
                                               ____________                                                  
                                             Appeal 2007-1102                                                
                                          Application 10/006,692                                             
                                          Technology Center 2100                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                                          Decided: June 11, 2007                                             
                                               ____________                                                  

                Before LEE E. BARRETT, LANCE LEONARD BARRY, and JOHN A.                                      
                JEFFERY, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                       
                JEFFERY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                        


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                      Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner’s                            
                rejection of claims 15-18 and 20-23.1  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.                  
                § 6(b).  We affirm.                                                                          
                                                                                                            
                1 Although all pending claims have been rejected, Appellants appeal only the                 
                rejection of claims 15-18 and 20-23 (Br. 1-2).  Accordingly, only claims                     



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013