Ex Parte Poppenga et al - Page 10

                Appeal 2007-1102                                                                             
                Application 10/006,692                                                                       
                                                                                                            
                established that the Examiner erred in finding that Chiloyan’s system stores                 
                (1) identification numbers and associated configuration information in a first               
                database, and (2) associated device drivers in a second database as recited in               
                representative claim 18.                                                                     

                                                DECISION                                                     
                      We have sustained the Examiner's rejection with respect to all claims                  
                on appeal.  Therefore, the Examiner’s decision rejecting claims 15-18 and                    
                20-23 is affirmed.                                                                           
                      No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with                     
                this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv).                               





















                                                     10                                                      

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013