Appeal 2007-1102 Application 10/006,692 established that the Examiner erred in finding that Chiloyan’s system stores (1) identification numbers and associated configuration information in a first database, and (2) associated device drivers in a second database as recited in representative claim 18. DECISION We have sustained the Examiner's rejection with respect to all claims on appeal. Therefore, the Examiner’s decision rejecting claims 15-18 and 20-23 is affirmed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv). 10Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013