The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.P.
__________
Appeal 2007-1106
Application 10/965,055
Technology Center 2800
__________
Decided: 25 May 2007
__________
Before RICHARD TORCZON, SALLY G. LANE, and SALLY C.
MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judges.
TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
INTRODUCTION
1 The claims on appeal relate generally to a battery for a portable
2 electronic device, where the battery housing does not impede docking of the
3 device to a docking station. The examiner has rejected claim 22 as
4 anticipated and claims 1-10, 18-21, and 23 as having been obvious. The
5 appellant (HP) seeks review of the rejections. We reverse the anticipation
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013