Ex Parte Wang et al - Page 1




                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                          
                                   is not binding precedent of the Board.                                    



                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ___________                                                   
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ___________                                                   
                                  Ex parte JUN WANG and LING HANG                                            
                                               ___________                                                   
                                             Appeal 2007-1115                                                
                                          Application 10/150,145                                             
                                          Technology Center 2600                                             
                                               ___________                                                   
                                          Decided: June 29, 2007                                             
                                               ___________                                                   

                Before JOSEPH L. DIXON, ALLEN R. MACDONALD, and                                              
                JEAN R. HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                
                DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                          



                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  









Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013