Ex Parte Dorsel et al - Page 14

                Appeal  2007-1132                                                                            
                Application 10/036,999                                                                       
                prosecution before the Examiner unless, as a mere incident to the limited                    
                prosecution, the affirmed rejection is overcome.                                             
                      If the Appellant elects prosecution before the Examiner and this does                  
                not result in allowance of the application, abandonment or a second appeal,                  
                this case should be returned to the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences                
                for final action on the affirmed rejection, including any timely request for                 
                rehearing thereof.                                                                           

                               AFFIRMED-IN-PART; 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b)                                        










                Ssc:                                                                                         






                AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.                                                                   
                INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ADMINISTRATION                                                         
                LEGAL DEPARTMENT, DL429                                                                      
                P.O. BOX 7599                                                                                
                LOVELAND, CO 80537-0599                                                                      

                                                     14                                                      

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14

Last modified: September 9, 2013