Ex Parte Cannon et al - Page 1



                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                          
                                   is not binding precedent of the Board.                                    

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ____________                                                  
                                                  Ex parte                                                   
                   PAUL DAVID CANNON and SURYANARAYANA SANKURATRI                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
                                             Appeal 2007-1139                                                
                                          Application 10/052,664                                             
                                          Technology Center 1600                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                                       Decided: September 20, 2007                                           
                                               ____________                                                  


                Before TONI R. SCHEINER, DONALD E. ADAMS, and LORA M.                                        
                GREEN, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                         
                GREEN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                          

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                      This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the                            
                Examiner’s final rejection of claim 1, which is reproduced below.  We have                   
                jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).                                                         
                   1. An isolated Npt2B polypeptide comprising the amino acid                                
                         sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:1.                                                  




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013