Appeal 2007-1144 Application 10/424,616 Thus, claim 14 is directed a composition containing cholesterol sulfate and a self-tanning agent, and claim 13 is directed to a method of artificially tanning the skin using such a composition. Claim 15 limits the self-tanning agent in claim 14’s composition to DHA (dihydroxyacetone). Claim 16 adds an imidazole to the DHA- containing composition of claim 15. 2. PRIOR ART The Examiner relies on the following references: Bernstein US 5,508,034 Apr. 16, 1996 Miklean US 5,705,145 Jan. 6, 1998 Cernasov US 5,976,519 Nov. 2, 1999 3. OBVIOUSNESS -- MIKLEAN AND BERNSTEIN Claims 13-16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious in view of Miklean and Bernstein (Answer 3). The Examiner cites Miklean as “teach[ing] skin tanning compositions containing dihydroxyacetone and imidazole as the tanning agents and moisturizers” (id.). The Examiner concedes that “[w]hat is lacking in Miklean is the teaching that the moisturizing agent is cholesterol sulfate” (id.). To meet this deficiency, the Examiner cites Bernstein as “advocat[ing] the use of either cholesterol or cholesterol sulfate as moisturizing agents in the treatment of dry skin” (id.). Based on these teachings, the Examiner concludes that one of ordinary skill would have considered it obvious to use cholesterol sulfate as the moisturizing agent in the skin tanning compositions of Miklean “since Bernstein teaches that sterols and sterol esters are naturally occurring in stratum corneum of the skin and they form a water 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013