Ex Parte Miller - Page 2


              Appeal 2007-1203                                                                                                
              Application 10/420,140                                                                                          

                                              SUMMARY OF DECISION                                                             
                      We AFFIRM the Examiner’s rejection of claims 1-24.                                                      

                                                    THE INVENTION                                                             
                      Appellant claims to have invented a method and system for controlling                                   
              image transparency.  In one embodiment of the disclosed invention, a method for                                 
              controlling the transparency of an image of an object includes modulating the                                   
              transparency of the image as a function of an angle of incidence of a vector normal                             
              to a viewing surface and the surface of the object (Specification 2).                                           
                      The appeal contains claims 1-24.  Claims 1, 6, 12, 16, and 20 are                                       
              independent claims.  Claim 1 is representative of the claimed invention:                                        
              1.      A method, comprising:                                                                                   
                      identifying a vector normal to a viewing surface and incident at a planar                               
              surface of an object, the vector having an angle of incidence at the planar surface;                            
              and                                                                                                             
                      modulating a transparency of an image of the object as a function of the                                
              angle of incidence.                                                                                             
                                                   THE REFERENCE                                                              
                      The Examiner relies upon the following reference as evidence of                                         
              anticipation:                                                                                                   
              Shinohara                     U.S. Pat. 5,880,735                        Mar. 9, 1999                          

                                                    THE REJECTION                                                             
                      Appellant seeks our review of the Examiner’s rejection of claims 1-24                                   
              under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by Shinohara.                                                     



                                                              2                                                               

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013