Appeal 2007-1203
Application 10/420,140
Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 41.37(c)(1)(vii)(2004), we have decided the appeal
with respect to claims 2-24 on the basis of the selected claim alone. Therefore, we
will sustain the Examiner’s rejection of these claims as being anticipated by
Shinohara for the same reasons discussed supra with respect to representative
claim 1.
CONCLUSION OF LAW
On the record before us, we find Appellant has not shown the Examiner
failed to establish a prima facie case of anticipation for each of claims 1-24.
DECISION
We affirm the Examiner’s rejection of claims 1-24.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this
appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv).
AFFIRMED
KIS
SCHWEGMAN, LUNDBERG, WOESSNER & KLUTH, P.A.
P. O. BOX 2938
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Last modified: September 9, 2013