1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
2 written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
3
4
5 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
6 _____________
7
8 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
9 AND INTERFERENCES
10 _____________
11
12 Ex parte BOBBY HU
13 _____________
14
15 Appeal No. 2007-1217
16 Application No. 10/219,135
17 Technology Center 3600
18 ______________
19
20 Decided: March 28, 2007
21 _______________
22
22 Before WILLIAM F. PATE, III, MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD, and ROBERT E.
23
23 NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judges.
24
25
25 PATE, III, Administrative Patent Judge.
26
27
28
29 DECISION ON APPEAL
30
31 This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1, 2, 4-10, 12-14, 20-39,
32 and 41-55. These are the only claims remaining in the application. We have
33 jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 134 (2002).
34 The claimed invention is a pawl for a reversible ratcheting wrench. The
35 pawl is characterized by two circular portions having engaging teeth, with each
36 circular toothed portion having a separate center of curvature.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013