Appeal 2007-1217
Application 10/219,135
1 based on the jurisprudence, why the Examiner has failed to make out a case of lack
2 of novelty to a preponderance of the evidence.
3 CONCLUSION
4 The Examiner has failed to establish that claim 1 on appeal lacks novelty
5 over the Hsieh reference by a preponderance of the evidence.
6 ORDER
7 The rejection of claims 1, 2, 4-10, 12-14, 20-39, and 41-55 is reversed.
8 REVERSED
9
10
11
12
13
14
15 hh
16
16 CONLEY ROSE, P.C.
17
17 P. O. BOX 3267
18
18 HOUSTON, TX 77253-3267
19
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5
Last modified: September 9, 2013