The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte XIAOJU WU, PINHAI HAO, IMRAN KHAN,
JOZEF C. MITROS, JAMES R. TODD, and ROBERT PAN
__________
Appeal 2007-1234
Application 10/017,990
Technology Center 2800
__________
Decided: July 13, 2007
__________
Before JAMES D. THOMAS, JOSEPH L. DIXON, and
ST. JOHN COURTENAY III, Administrative Patent Judges.
COURTENAY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the
Examiner’s rejection of claims 1-30. We have jurisdiction under
35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
We AFFIRM.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013