Appeal 2007-1235
Application 09/748,125
5. Claim 12 further limits the error data capture to writing values to
variables in memory and saving those values to the tracking database
referenced to the internal document identifiers.
6. The Examiner found
As per dependent claim 12, Ricker and Puckett disclose the
limitations similar to those in claim 1, and the same rejection is
incorporated herein. Puckett further discloses a process wherein error
data is captured by writing values to variables in memory, and
subsequently saving said values to the tracking database referenced to
the internal document identifiers (Fig. 3, items 308-316, Fig 3 details
how tuples are stored in a metalanguage (which must occur in
variables), then outputted to a database).
Answer 6.
7. Appellants traversed the Examiner’s findings by arguing the
following:
[T]he rejection of claim 12 does not indicate how translation errors in
trading partner documents are correlated to variables and stored
referenced to the internal document identifiers (which are not
disclosed by any of the applied references).
Appeal Br. 7.
C. Principles of Law
We incorporate herein the principles of law under the Principles of
Law section for the rejection of claims 1-2, 6, 7, and 13-20 above.
D. Analysis
Appellants’ arguments are unpersuasive in showing error in the
Examiner’s findings.
As to the Examiner’s finding with respect to the subject matter of
claim 11 (FF 3), Appellants did not traverse the substance of the finding that
18
Page: Previous 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013