The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte ARTHUR J. EPSTEIN and YUNZHANG Z. WANG ____________ Appeal 2007-1261 Application 10/196,523 Technology Center 1700 ____________ Decided: June 13, 2007 ____________ Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, BRADLEY R. GARRIS, and CHUNG K. PAK, Administrative Patent Judges. GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims 1, 5-7, 12, 13, 15, 17, 20, and 21. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013