Ex Parte Warren et al - Page 2

                Appeal 2007-1266                                                                              
                Application 10/125,204                                                                        

                      This is an appeal from the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-5, 8-                 
                16, and 18-19.  Claims 6, 7, 17, and 20 are allowed.  We have jurisdiction                    
                over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).                                                 
                      We affirm.                                                                              
                      Appellants’ invention relates to a sample mounting press for molding                    
                a thermoplastic or thermosetting material around a metallic specimen for                      
                ease of handling in subsequent polishing and analyzing processes.                             
                (Specification [0002-0003]).  Independent Claim 1 is reproduced below:                        
                      1. A metallographic sample mounting press comprising:                                   
                      a cylindrical sample molding chamber open at opposite ends;                             
                      a ram extendable into said sample molding chamber from one end for                      
                compressing a sample molding therein; and                                                     
                      a rigid face seal assembly removably secured to an end of said                          
                chamber opposite said ram, said assembly having a cylindrical cap defining                    
                a flat face seal with a diameter greater than the diameter of said cylindrical                
                sample molding chamber for externally enclosing and sealing said opposite                     
                end of said molding chamber against the pressure encountered during the                       
                molding of a metallographic sample.                                                           

                      The Examiner relies on the following prior art reference to show                        
                unpatentability:                                                                              
                Schwarzkopf   US 3,922,127  Nov. 25, 1975                                                     
                      The Examiner made the following rejections:                                             
                      1. Claims 1-5, 8-16, and 18-19 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second                            
                paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement.                     



                                                      2                                                       

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013