Appeal 2007-1266
Application 10/125,204
ORDER
The rejection of claims 1-5, 8-16, and 18-19 under 35 U.S.C. § 112,
second paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description
requirement is reversed.
The rejection of claims 1-5, 8-16, and 18-19 under 35 U.S.C. § 112,
first paragraph, as indefinite is reversed.
The rejection of claims 1-5, 8-16, and 18-19 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)
as anticipated by Schwarzkopf is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(i)(iv).
AFFIRMED
sld/ls
PRICE, HENEVELD, COOPER,
DEWITT & LITTTON, LLP
695 KENMOOR, S.E.
P.O. BOX 2567
GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49501
enables the claimed invention, and not how the prior art characterizes that
disclosure or whether alternatives are also disclosed”).
11
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Last modified: September 9, 2013