Ex Parte LeRose - Page 1


                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                          
                           for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                 

                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                   
                                                  ____________                                                        
                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                    
                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                         
                                                  ____________                                                        
                                         Ex parte JEFFREY W. LEROSE                                                   
                                                  ____________                                                        
                                                Appeal 2007-1289                                                      
                                              Application 10/425,899                                                  
                                             Technology Center 2100                                                   
                                                  ____________                                                        
                                              Decided: May 15, 2007                                                   
                                                  ____________                                                        

                 Before JAMES D. THOMAS, JOSEPH L. DIXON, and JEAN R.                                                 
                 HOMERE,  Administrative Patent Judges.                                                               
                 THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                 



                                            DECISION ON APPEAL                                                        
                        This appeal involves claims 4 through 6, 8, 10, 13, 15, 16, and 20                            
                 through 22.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. �� 6(b) and 134(a).  An                            
                 Oral Hearing on this appeal occurred on May 9, 2007.                                                 
                        As best representative of the disclosed and claimed invention,                                
                 independent claim 21 is reproduced below:                                                            




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013