Ex Parte LeRose - Page 1



                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                          
                           for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                 

                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                   
                                                  ____________                                                        
                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                    
                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                         
                                                  ____________                                                        
                                         Ex parte JEFFREY W. LEROSE                                                   
                                                  ____________                                                        
                                                Appeal 2007-1289                                                      
                                              Application 10/425,899                                                  
                                             Technology Center 2100                                                   
                                                  ____________                                                        
                                              Decided: May 15, 2007                                                   
                                                  ____________                                                        

                 Before JAMES D. THOMAS, JOSEPH L. DIXON, and JEAN R.                                                 
                 HOMERE,  Administrative Patent Judges.                                                               
                 THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                 



                                            DECISION ON APPEAL                                                        
                        This appeal involves claims 4 through 6, 8, 10, 13, 15, 16, and 20                            
                 through 22.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. §§ 6(b) and 134(a).  An                            
                 Oral Hearing on this appeal occurred on May 9, 2007.                                                 
                        As best representative of the disclosed and claimed invention,                                
                 independent claim 21 is reproduced below:                                                            




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013