Appeal 2007-1289
Application 10/425,899
and encryption capabilities discussed at page 8 of the Specification as filed.
An artisan’s understanding of the software within the portable device 15 of
Sabet as well as the limited software within the flash memory 13 of this
reference are both separate from the operating system software on the
computer 11 in Sabet’s figure 1 to the extent recited in dependent claim 8 on
appeal. Our earlier remarks in this opinion are reflective of the obvious
nature of the subject matter of claims 13, 15, 16, and 20.
In view of the foregoing, the decision of the Examiner rejecting all
claims on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. §1.136(a). See 37 C.F.R.
§ 1.136(a)(1)(iv).
AFFIRMED
pgc
Daniels Daniels & Verdonik, P.A.
Suite 200 Generation Plaza
1822 N. C. Highway 54 East
Durham, NC 27713
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Last modified: September 9, 2013