Appeal 2007-1301 Application 09/924,322 CONCLUSION OF LAW Based on the findings of facts and analysis above, we conclude that the Examiner erred in rejecting claims 1 to 7, but not in rejecting claim 8. DECISION The Examiner's rejection of claims 1 to 7 is Reversed. The rejection of claim 8 is Affirmed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv). 9Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013