Ex Parte Whitmyer - Page 2

           Appeal 2007-1305                                                                       
           Application 09/725,394                                                                 

       1      The Appellant invented an Internet-based system for preparing the documents         
       2   used for performing due diligence, transfer, and recording transfer of intellectual    
       3   properties pursuant to an acquisition, divestiture, merger, IPO, change of name, or    
       4   the like (Specification 1).  An understanding of the invention can be derived from a   
       5   reading of exemplary claim 1, which is reproduced below.                               
       6         1. A system for automating the recordation of a property transfer                
       7         comprising:                                                                      
       8         an Internet server;                                                              
       9         a communications link between said Internet server and the Internet;             
       10        at least one database containing a plurality of information records              
       11        accessible by said Internet server, each information record including            
       12        an intellectual property identification number;                                  
       13        at least one database containing a plurality of recordation forms                
       14        accessible by said Internet server;                                              
       15        software executing on said Internet server for receiving a transfer              
       16        request indicative of a transfer of rights to the property; and                  
       17        software executing on said Internet server for querying said database            
       18        of information records to retrieve an information record corresponding           
       19        to a transfer request, for querying said database of recordation forms           
       20        to retrieve a recordation form corresponding to said transfer request,           
       21        and for combining the retrieved information record with the retrieved            
       22        recordation form to generate a document.                                         
       23                                                                                         
       24     This appeal arises from the Examiner’s Final Rejection, mailed May 22, 2006.        
       25  The Appellant filed an Appeal Brief in support of the appeal on August 23, 2006,       
       26  and the Examiner mailed an Examiner’s Answer to the Appeal Brief on November           
       27  17, 2006.  A Reply Brief was filed on December 21, 2006.                               




                                                2                                                 


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013