Appeal 2007-1305
Application 09/725,394
1 The Examiner resolves this deficiency by finding that Fucarile shows: software
2 for querying said database of information records to retrieve an information record
3 corresponding to a transfer request; for querying said database of recordation forms
4 to retrieve a recordation form corresponding to said transfer request, and for
5 combining the retrieved information record with the retrieved recordation form to
6 generate a document.
7 The Examiner contends that each of these references suggests the other
8 because they can be adapted to hold license records (recordation form) and receive
9 and store access information such as the number of accesses and user information,
10 and the license server can then generate usage reports that can be used to determine
11 licensing requirements. Therefore, the Examiner concludes that it would have
12 been obvious to a person of ordinary skill to combine the teachings of Fucarile
13 with the teachings of Schneider to reach the claimed subject matter. (Answer 3-5).
14 The Appellant contends that
15 • Neither Schneider nor Fucarile teach, disclose, or suggest software executing
16 on the Internet server for querying the database of information records to
17 retrieve an information record corresponding to a transfer request, for
18 querying the database of recordation forms to retrieve a recordation form
19 corresponding to the transfer request, and for combining the retrieved
20 information record with the retrieved recordation form to generate a transfer
21 document (Br. 7-10);
22 • Neither Schneider nor Fucarile teach, disclose or suggest software executing
23 on said Internet server for receiving a transfer request indicative of a transfer
24 of rights to the property (Br. 10-11);
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013