Ex Parte Zimmerman et al - Page 7

              Appeal 2007-1308                                                                                              
              Application 10/097,398                                                                                        

         1                                      PRINCIPLES OF LAW                                                           
         2           We begin with the language of the claims.  The general rule is that terms in                           
         3    the claim are to be given their ordinary and accustomed meaning.  Johnson                                     
         4    Worldwide Assocs. v. Zebco Corp., 175 F.3d 985, 989, 50 USPQ2d 1607, 1610                                     
         5    (Fed. Cir. 1999).  In the USPTO, claims are construed giving their broadest                                   
         6    reasonable interpretation.                                                                                    
         7           [T]he Board is required to use a different standard for construing                                     
         8           claims than that used by district courts. We have held that it is error                                
         9           for the Board to “appl[y] the mode of claim interpretation that is used                                
        10           by courts in litigation, when interpreting the claims of issued patents                                
        11           in connection with determinations of infringement and validity.”  In re                                
        12           Zletz, 893 F.2d 319, 321, 13 USPQ2d 1320 (Fed. Cir. 1989); accord                                      
        13           In re Morris, 127 F.3d 1048, 1054, 44 USPQ2d 1023 (Fed. Cir. 1997)                                     
        14           (“It would be inconsistent with the role assigned to the PTO in issuing                                
        15           a patent to require it to interpret claims in the same manner as judges                                
        16           who, post-issuance, operate under the assumption the patent is                                         
        17           valid.”). Instead, as we explained above, the PTO is obligated to give                                 
        18           claims their broadest reasonable interpretation during examination.                                    
        19    In re Am. Acad. of Sci. Tech Ctr., 367 F.3d 1359, 1364, 70 USPQ2d 1827, 1830                                  
        20    (Fed. Cir. 2004).                                                                                             
        21                                                                                                                  
        22        A claimed invention is unpatentable if the differences between it and the prior                           
        23    art are “such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the                               
        24    time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art.”  35                                
        25    U.S.C. § 103(a) (2000); In re Kahn, 441 F.3d 977, 985 (Fed. Cir. 2006) (citing                                
        26    Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 13-14, (1966)).  In Graham, the Court held                              
        27    that that the obviousness analysis begins with several basic factual inquiries: “[(1)]                        
        28    the scope and content of the prior art are to be determined; [(2)] differences                                
        29    between the prior art and the claims at issue are to be ascertained; and [(3)] the                            

                                                             7                                                              


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013