Appeal 2007-1326
Application 10/237,067
1 and 173 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over Young, Ireland, Olmsted, and
2 Swensen.
3
4 DECISION
5 To summarize, our decision is as follows:
6 • The rejection of claims 106, 109, 114, 135-140, 194-198, 200, and 204-205
7 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over Young and Ireland is sustained.
8 • The rejection of claims 107, 116-118, 120, 122, 127, 149-152, 154, 159,
9 161-163, 165, 167, 172, 180-185, 199, and 201-203 under 35 U.S.C.
10 § 103(a) as obvious over Young, Ireland, and Olmsted is sustained.
11 • The rejection of claims 115, 128, 160, and 173 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
12 obvious over Young, Ireland, Olmsted, and Swensen is sustained.
13 No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal
14 may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a)(1)(iv).
15 AFFIRMED
16 JRG
17
18 Michael E. Fogarty
19 McDermott, Will & Emery
20 600 13th Street, N.W.
21 Washington, DC 20005-3096
22
24
Page: Previous 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Last modified: September 9, 2013