The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte KIRAN V. CHATTY, PETER E. COTTRELL, ROBERT J. GAUTHIER, JR., and MUJAHID MUHAMMAD ____________ Appeal 2007-1360 Application 10/605,699 Technology Center 2800 ____________ Decided: June 26, 2007 ____________ Before JOHN C. MARTIN, JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO, and ALLEN R. MACDONALD, Administrative Patent Judges. RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL STATEMENT OF THE CASE Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Final Rejection of claims 1-31. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). Appellants’ claimed invention relates to a system and method for suppressing latch-up within integrated circuits. Based on a recognition thatPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013