Ex Parte Sichi et al - Page 1



                        The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is                            
                                      not binding precedent of the Board                                         
                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                
                                           ____________________                                                  
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                 
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                     
                                           ____________________                                                  
                     Ex parte STEPHEN F. SICHI, ELIZABETH J. KLEIN-LEBBINK,                                      
                                                and LISA KUO                                                     
                                           ____________________                                                  
                                              Appeal 2007-1362                                                   
                                            Application 09/972,107                                               
                                           Technology Center 2600                                                
                                           ____________________                                                  
                                         Decided: September 26, 2007                                             
                                           ____________________                                                  
                Before JOHN C. MARTIN, MAHSHID D. SAADAT,                                                        
                and ROBERT E. NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judges.                                               
                SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                             


                                        STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                    
                       Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the Examiner’s                            
                rejection of claims 1-3, 5-15, and 17-26, which are all of the claims pending                    
                in this application as claims 4 and 16 have been canceled.  We have                              
                jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).                                                             
                       Appellants’ invention relates to a switching method and apparatus                         
                used in satellite transponder applications (Specification 3).  According to                      
                Appellants, typical switching networks, as depicted in Figure 2, require the                     




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013