The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________________ Ex parte STEPHEN F. SICHI, ELIZABETH J. KLEIN-LEBBINK, and LISA KUO ____________________ Appeal 2007-1362 Application 09/972,107 Technology Center 2600 ____________________ Decided: September 26, 2007 ____________________ Before JOHN C. MARTIN, MAHSHID D. SAADAT, and ROBERT E. NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judges. SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge. STATEMENT OF THE CASE Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the Examiner’s rejection of claims 1-3, 5-15, and 17-26, which are all of the claims pending in this application as claims 4 and 16 have been canceled. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). Appellants’ invention relates to a switching method and apparatus used in satellite transponder applications (Specification 3). According to Appellants, typical switching networks, as depicted in Figure 2, require thePage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013