The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte JOHN S. CAPOCCIA
______________
Appeal 2007-1365
Reexamination Control 90/006,595
Patent 6,289,548
Technology Center 1700
_______________
Decided: May 24, 2007
Before FRED E. McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Judge, and MICHAEL
P. TIERNEY, and MARK NAGUMO, Administrative Patent Judges.
TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. '' 134 and 306
(2006) from the Examiner's final rejection of claims 1-20 in the above-
identified reexamination proceeding.
We affirm.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013