Ex Parte 6289548 et al - Page 16

                Appeal 2007-1365                                                                              
                Reexamination Control 90/006,595                                                              
                Patent 6,289,548                                                                              
                decorative finishes on painted walls.  The Australian application teaches that                
                artificial sponges can be used to create desired patterns.  In particular, the                
                Australian application teaches that any desired pattern can produced on                       
                painted surfaces by painting with sponges that had sufficient portions of the                 
                sponge face removed.  Based upon the teachings of the prior art, one of                       
                ordinary skill in the art would have understood that a desired paint pattern                  
                may be created by removing portions from the surface of a paint roller to                     
                achieve the desired sponge painting effect.                                                   
                      Patentee contends that the Australian application teaches away from                     
                Patentee’s claimed beveled corner roller as required by claims 2, 3, 9, 10, 16                
                and 17.  (Ans. at 12).  In particular, Patentee states that the Australian                    
                application describes its edges as substantially flat in order to avoid overlap               
                marks.  (Id.).  Patentee states that Wakat shows a beveled corner roller.                     
                (Id.).  One of ordinary skill in the art would have understood that the use of a              
                beveled roller would aid in the painting of corners and that the Australian                   
                application does not teach otherwise.                                                         
                      Patentee argues that the prior art references fail to describe the use of               
                a rotating grinding wheel to tear the face of the sponge as required by claims                
                6, 13, and 20.  (Br. at 12).  As discussed above, Patentee’s grinding wheel                   
                recitation is a product-by-process limitation.  Patentee has failed to                        
                demonstrate that the use of a grinding wheel creates a sponge face surface                    
                that is distinct from that suggested by the prior art, i.e., removing surface                 
                material such that the resulting surface creates the desired paint effect.                    
                      Patentee also contends that the prior art fails to show the depth of the                
                pattern, such as the 0.5 inches to 0.75 inches set forth in Patentee’s claim 7.               
                Wakat however, describes the use of 0.5 inch nap portions to create irregular                 

                                                     16                                                       

Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013